home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
WINMX Assorted Textfiles
/
Ebooks.tar
/
Text - Misc - How to prove anything.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2003-06-21
|
8KB
|
153 lines
How to prove anything
How to prove anything
HOW TO PROVE ANYTHING (source unknown)6-15-89
Proof by example:
The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests
that it contains most of
the ideas of the general proof.
Proof by intimidation:
"Trivial."
"Intuitively obvious to the most casual observer."
Proof by vigorous handwaving:
Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
Proof by cumbersome notation:
Best done with access to at least four alphabets
and special symbols.
Proof by exhaustion:
An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof
is useful.
Proof by omission:
"The reader may easily supply the details . . . "
"The other 253 cases are analogous . . . "
Proof by obfuscation:
A long plotless sequence of true and/or
meaningless syntactically related
statements.
Proof by wishful citation:
The author cites the negation, converse, or
generalization of a theorem
from the literature to support his claims.
Proof by funding:
How could three different government agencies be
wrong?
Proof by eminent authority:
"I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was
probably NP-complete."
Proof by personal communication:
"Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is
NP-complete."
[Karp, personal communication]."
Proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
"To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle
stripping is decidable, we
reduce it to the halting problem."
Proof by reference to inaccessible literature:
The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem
to be found in a
privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian
Philological Society, 1883.
Proof by importance:
"A large body of useful consequences all follow
from the proposition in
question."
Proof by accumulated evidence:
"Long and diligent search has not revealed a
counterexample."
Proof by cosmology:
"The negation of the proposition is unimaginable
or meaningless." (Popular
for proofs of the existence of God.)
Proof by mutual reference:
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from
Theorem 3 in reference B,
which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in
reference C, which is an easy
consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A.
Proof by metaproof:
A method is given to construct the desired proof.
The correctness of the
method is proved by any of these techniques.
Proof by picture:
A more convincing form of proof by example.
Combines well with proof by
omission.
Proof by vehement assertion:
It is useful to have some kind of authority
relation to the audience.
Proof by ghost reference:
Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem
appears in the
reference given.
Proof by forward reference:
Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the
author, which is often
not as forthcoming as at first.
Proof by semantic shift:
Some of the standard but inconvenient definitions
are changed for the
statement of the result.
Proof by appeal to intuition:
Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.
Now, the lab session: A group of scientists of all
kinds gathered one day
to prove that all odd numbers were prime numbers.
The mathematician was first: "One is a prime
number, three is a prime
number, five is a prime number, seven is a prime
number. Thus by induction,
all odd numbers are prime."
Then came the physicist: "One is a prime number,
three is a prime number,
five is a prime number, seven is a prime number.
Nine is NOT a prime number.
Eleven is a prime nummber, thirteen is a prime
number. Well, nine falls within
experimental error, so all odd numbers are prime."
Finally the chemist: "One is a prime number, three
is a prime number, five
is a prime number, seven is a prime number, nine
is a prime number . . .
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this
page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
The site layout, page layout, and all original
artwork on this site are Copyright ⌐ 2002
totse.com.
If you have any questions about this, please check
out our Copyright Policy.